Internet Censorship v. Facing Your Accuser, Civil Rights activism in America: Friends of Fullerton’s Future; Tony Bushala’s hate blog

Friends of Fullerton’s Future, is a nightmarish blog: Defamation is encouraged by Administrator and Head Jackal Tony Bushala.

Internet Censorship v. Facing Your Accuser, Civil Rights activism in America: Friends of Fullerton’s Future;
TONY BUSHALA’S HATE BLOG
On December 29, 2011, regards comment # 34 by blog commentator ‘FPD one fan,’ on ‘Friends of Fullerton’ Blog, under post title: ‘Pat McKinley Can Find Soulmates Among Egyptian Junta.’
FPD one fan wrote: “…Ron and Kathy Thomas let their mentally ill son loose on the citizens of Fullerton they gave them chance after chance to help him but they would have no part of it. Kelly’s death is as unfortunate as all deaths are but it was the fault of Kelly, his dad and other family members who turned their back on him not the two officers who are now being used as scapegoats by political opportunists like Chris Thompson and Tony Bushala and everyone with an axe to grind against police officers.”

Commentator, ToF, attempted to submit a reply, but was censored from asking: “Do you have specific examples; when Ron Thomas rejected FPD attempts to contact him regarding his son? Ron claims that it was ‘understood:’ they would call him; he would respond by retrieving Kelly. Dirty cops do not spring fully formed from the sidewalk, they are created and nurtured when ‘good men do nothing.’”

The Thomas family watched a stream of money flow into the coffers of ‘causes’ that addressed their son’s (supposed) mental condition, for years. When he was murdered the Thomas family jealously ‘saw their cause/opportunity and took it,’ to quote ‘Plunkett of Tammany Hall.’ You saw the u-tube of Kelly’s sister denying over, and over, and over that the Thomas family is all about the money; (sniffle sob, sniffle sob, she asserts that “Kelly wanted to live that way,” she insists, while offering Café Press mugs and cups for sale, touting Kelly’s picture and her ‘cause:’ feasting on Kelly’s carcass, like a vulture to carrion). What was Kelly’s alternative to street life, a war zone called home and family? “Me thinks the lady (Macbeth) doth protest too much.”

There was a woman, on Friends of Fullerton for a week (Carolyn Phillips AKA Nancy Wood) who asked the difficult questions, she was censored, figures, by OC Weekley’s Scott Moxly, and Tony Bushala; not to be confused with ‘the thinkers of society,’ by anyone but each other. Carolyn Phillips (a confirmed kill) was treated, sight unseen, like ‘the enemy’ by Bushala: in comments following the Post “Heeeeere’s Molly!”
Comment #93, authored by ‘Wrong Guy,’ on December 25, 2011, states, “Merry Christmas to all of you; yes even you ‘swinetrolls’. We know you have voices too…” concluding that ‘Friends of Fullerton’ is “good enough” to allow admittance to, even, the homeless, the commentator stares, “‘Friends of Fullerton,’ is good enough to let you in and say what you wish.” For the moment, however short lived.
Finally Carolyn “swinetroll” Phillips, was silenced altogether, although she has worked in association with Presidential Task Force appointees, since the Reagan Administration, on issues that pertain to street life in America: police misconduct, homelessness, and immigration. She wrote a piece on censorship which includes comments that were censored on ‘Friends of Fullerton,’ see ‘Internet Censorship v. Facing Your Accuser; Civil Rights activism in America.’ Her investigation of the Kelly Thomas murder is at freetibetbooks.wordpress.com you dare not tell the truth on the ‘Friends of Fullerton’ Blog, but you can tell her.

“Was Kelly ‘schizophrenic,’ or was his diagnosis the traditional pejorative applied to those witnesses of cop crimes who know too much. Ron Thomas’ camp didn’t get anything off of me, so now they are on ‘Friends of Fullerton’ and other sites, all day, every day, vilifying me. They didn’t treat Kelly any better. But he was kind to everyone, in spite of them.” -Carolyn Phillips

Carolyn Phillips, deemed “swinetroll,” by ‘Friends of Fullerton’s Future,’ knows Hellen, (AKA Crazy Mary) which is why Carolyn was so disdained and rudely batch filed into the category of malicious capitalist / abusive mentally ill derelict, by Ron Thomas. Mary claims that Ron takes her into his home periodically and gives her the key to a storage area where he rapes her and beats her, she flees abandoning her belongings. Mary tells her story on an endless loop, and has been for years: Mary is a cross-eyed, prostitute / homeless woman, her story appears to be just that: every prostitute has one. Anyone who gets too close to Mary gets arrested. I met her when she pinched a Chanel jacket off of the back of my chair while I was in the restroom at Car’s Jr., when I asked for it back she told me her sad story of abuse by Ron. I asked her why she keeps going back. (Maybe because it’s just a ‘pity poor me story,’ and it never happened.) When I told the police about it, they went off on me and arrested me: Maybe it did happen.

BEFORE: December 29, 2011, ‘Friends of Fullerton’ COMMENTS READ AS FOLLOWS, before being censored…

Streets of Fullerton on December 29, 2011
Officer DiCaprio, officer to the homeless in Fullerton was on hand tonight with two other officers to help a women who got off the train from New York with an apparent missed connection and a luggage mix up. She was acting very distressed and upset most the day around the station. A “plumber” in a white van showed up with a clipboard and was overheard on the phone saying,” I got another one for you.” A while later an ambulance showed up with a stretcher and amidst her unwillingness to be a participant was taken away. The police remained calm throughout the ordeal. Sad it had to end up that way for her.

Concerned Texan on December 29, 2011
Why didn’t you do something to help calm her down and get her away from those officers if you knew that they were going to take her away and lock her up? Why did you just stand there and take pictures?

Screenwriter on December 29, 2011
Bodybag!!

ToF on December 29, 2011
Do you mean that he should have done something, more conscionable: something more like the way that all of you so valiantly put yourselves at the disposal of the ‘Carolyn Phillips’ person who showed up here a few days ago and got kicked to the curb by a bunch of voyeuristic spectators to the crimes that you contrived against her? Is that what you mean by ‘why didn’t you do something to help…get her away’ from obvious victimization? Because you aren’t obvious victimizers and would never endorse such a thing? No mob mentality here right? It’s always the other guy right; those other people who do terrible things: THEY need to be critiqued by you.

Tuco Ramirez on December 29, 2011
Tuco thinks in black and white and poster FPD #1 fan sounds like the Sgt. Goodlie party…

AFTER: December 29, 2011, Friends of Fullerton Blog COMMENTS AFTER they were censored, notice that commentator ‘ToF’ is gone ….

Concerned Texan on December 29, 2011
Why didn’t you do something to help calm her down and get her away from those officers if you knew that they were going to take her away and lock her up? Why did you just stand there and take pictures?

Screenwriter on December 29, 2011
Bodybag!!

Streets of Fullerton’ on December 29, 2011
If you were there you would see that I did, confront both ambulance drivers, the mental health worker, and one of the officers. I also tried to get a taxi driver and homeless man to help me to no avail. I was using camera as last resort at the point I was confronting to let them know they were being documented. The mental health worker said” we’re not negotiating”. Also I wasn’t there during the day so didn’t know the total circumstances involved. Thank you (Concerned Texan) for being so.

Concerned Texan on December 29, 2011
I am glad that there are still people who care and who would at least try to help someone in such a frightening situation.

Tuco Ramirez on December 29, 2011
Tuco thinks in black and white and poster FPD #1 fan sounds like the Sgt. Goodlie party…

OTHER FRIENDS OF FULLERTON’S FUTURE BLOG COMMENTS: TOWARD CENSORING CAROLYN PHILLIPS:

seer2some on December 29, 2011
There was nothing contrived against Carolyn Phillips, , (original grammatical error) her OWN words were posted again for her to view. If she had problems facing what she has said, then maybe she needs to take more care in chosing (original spelling) her words. The only mob mentally I see here is your own…….Her posts were abusive to many posters, not vice versa…

seer2some on December 29, 2011
You evidently didn’t read her posts, , she was never abusive to me, , she was just fine. But, there are others that would have cause for concern. You are entitled to your opinion, just like everyone else is entitled to theirs…..

HAVING FORCED CENSORSHIP of Carolyn Phillips/Nancy Wood, seer2some retreated, to a ‘who me,’ posture, while claiming that “others” were at issue, not him. (Carolyn Phillips was not the author of any “posts,” she was a commentator, contrary to the assertion by seer2some). He does not cite to any actual comments (termed posts) in his accusations: a dirty tactic; obscuring and convoluting facts, to disable Carolyn Phillips’ defense: Like Eddie Haskel he makes her a blamable victim, claiming that she was impugned by: “her OWN words,” (attached below), which seer2some lifted out of context from another blog. He states, “Maybe she needs to take more care in chosing (original) her words;” (having been blocked by the moderator Bushala, censored, she is not allowed to defend “her own words;” thus seer2some employs yet another dirty tactic). Maybe he needs to “take more care” when he lies.
Seer2some also states, “If she had problems facing what she has said, then maybe she needs to take more care in chosing (original) her words.” Reading the interaction (excerpted below) it becomes clear that seer2some has the ‘problem,’ and is trying to hide the fact that it is his words, which he “has problems facing,” to the degree that he distorts them entirely and forces Carolyn Phillips censorship, rather than letting her defend herself. Seer2some’s comments to Carolyn Phillips, were extraordinarily manipulative, abusive, and aggressive: His accusations lack any basis in fact. Decide for yourself:

LETS TAKE A LOOK AS SEER2SOME ATTACKED CAROLYN PHILLIPS / NANCY WOOD, AND AT ‘WHAT SHE SAID: and at how Tony ‘Jackal’ Bushala treated her comments. (grammar and spelling errors per original)

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Knock it off Carolyn/Nancy, , you’re not homeless, you’re an opportunist……..look at her book for sale now, she’s posted on the cover that it was banned in Fullerton………
Also, this is her office address at the top of a letter she sent to her attorney, when Ron Thomas told her he was having his lawyers formally tell her to leave him alone…..

SEER2SOME QUOTES CAROLYN PHILLIPS OUT OF CONTEXT, from an email to Sean Cup, a wildlife photographer, with no interest in the Thomas situation. Seer2some later states that he intended to “out” Carolyn Phillips street address (a drop box) to predators:

seer2some on December 26, 2011
(Nancy Wood wrote) “…I hope I am responding correctly, my email is freetibetbooks@email.com …and my business address is 4918 W. First Street #211, Santa Ana, Ca. 92703 (send me as many of your photos as you can! Any at all is a good start, I love your work! -Nancy Wood”

(The address is a drop box SEER2SOME THEN LIFTS CAROLYN PHILLIPS / NANCY WOOD’S COMMENTS, from another blog as NANCY WOOD policemc.)

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Nancy Wood commented (on Doing It Homeless, blog).
”Why is it that you imagine you are helping by prolonging the agony of begging (when you give to panhandlers)? Why do people think it’s OK? Really if you thought about it, would you like yourself for simply throwing more pain in his direction. You can call it giving, but you should rather ask yourself Who Is Benefiting From This. Look, here is a letter that I wrote to my lawyer (fellow homeless person Doug Barker Esq.) when Kelly’s family threatened to sue me:
Dear Doug, Maybe you knew the Kelly Thomas family, they went off on me when I offered to give them the proceeds from the sale of the book, The Jabberwocky, so I had to reinstall it on blurb, maybe the preview will be up tomorrow, his picture is on one page, and there is some commentary about him on another, it’s a book about the roots of homelessness, Kelly’s family threatened to sue me, then I found that they never even so much as looked at the cover of the book, to come up with an endless diatribe defaming me, they certainly didn’t read it, some stranger who doesn’t know any of us and has never been to the preview site had been emailing Ron (Kelly’s dad) every day on his blog with long winded diatribes about me, stating that I was exploiting Kelly. I still have no idea of who she is or why she would say all of that. Aside from the fact that she was probably drunk and bored, but what seems sad to me is that Ron got really nasty about it, actually I think that it was Ron’s brother, it definitely was a Thomas, and he definitely had bought a lot of misinformation, but anyway one of them put some really stupid nasty comments, regarding my efforts, up on his site, not for any reason other than he is so jealous of all of the money he’s making in donations on the Kelly memorial site, that he cares more about that than about Kelly’s memory, he didn’t like Kelly when Kelly was alive, according to Kelly, actually I think that he towed the cop line, regarding the homeless, but now that Kelly is dead, Ron is the most devoted father on earth, harvesting his memory, while accusing me of doing same, sight unseen. What a creep. It’s like a wolves den over there, they are all so vicious and ravenous to get something off of Kelly’s memory. All of the Charities who banned Kelly when he was alive are jealously sucking in millions from his death. Kelly didn’t have anything good to say about any of them when they could have been his benefactors, and now he is their benefactor. Mary’s kitchen had banned Kelly, yet they were so happy to accept a donation from Ron’s wife that they had the police escort Mrs. Wyatt off of the property when she tried to tell Ron’s wife that Mary’s had kicked Kelly out. All of these people were meaner than cat shit to Kelly when he was on the street; now that he is in the grave they pat themselves on the back saying they had been his ‘support.’ Anyway it makes me all the happier that I wrote an expose about it. You should email Kathy, ask her about Gloria getting the cops to tell her that Mary’s is exempt from the law, and they would arrest Kathy for telling Ron’s wife the truth. How much further would one have to look for the cause of homelessness than at the commercialization of it by the 501c charities. People are not as stupid as they are greedy.”

(CAROLYN PHILLIPS as NANCY WOOD, DEFENDS HERSELF TO HER ACCUSER, seer2some BY RESTATING THE FACTS)

policemc on December 26, 2011
Ron threatened to sue me through some stranger, one of you, when she lied to him that I had, and he assumed that I had used unauthorized photos. I have no idea why she did that. I responded that making assumptions is stupid, and that threatening a lawsuit is unlawful unless papers have been filed ($700). I said get over yourself, I’m sure we will end up being friends. But Ron is stuck on dollars, so, he assumed that the book is a money maker, and he wanted his cut. Kind of a crass guy if you ask me, greedy too. If someone gifted me a book as a fund raiser for my dead kids memory, I would not have been so tacky, I would have said, ‘tell me about your friendship, how did you know my child.’ But Ron has something that he doesn’t want known; what Kelly’s friends know. What is it? The heading on my blog, reads ‘Banned in Fullerton,’ because it’s funny, get it, who the hell cares about Fullerton. If it said, Banned in China, that would mean something, what kind of an idiot write ‘Banned in Fullerton,’ most people who read that, fall over laughing. Maybe you are too stoned to get it. It’s a very funny book, starting with ‘Banned in Fullerton.’

AWAITING MODERATION (AKA Censored)
Most of the following comments authored by Carolyn Phillips / Nancy Wood were submitted but ignored; marked ‘awaiting moderation’ by Tony ‘Jackal’ Bushala, they are still waiting. FROM THIS POINT ON CAROLYN PHILLIPS IS CENSORED from defending herself: Read and decide for yourself if Carolyn Phillips AKA Nancy Wood as Policemc gave anyone ‘cause’ to fear for their free speech or the safety of their “opinions.” Seer2some is the threat here: his persecution of Carolyn Phillips gives Hitler a run for his money.

policemc on December 28, 2011
(Dear) Seer2some, In regard to your comment on December 26, 2011, (in which you stated) “Knock it off Carolyn/Nancy, , you’re not homeless, you’re an opportunist……..look at her book for sale now, she’s posted on the cover that it was banned in Fullerton………”
The Jabberwocky does not state ‘Banned in Fullerton’ on the cover, the description on freetibetbooks.wordpress.com states Banned In Fullerton, the blurb.com description states Banned in Fullerton; the cover simply states FreeTibet; because it’s funny, as if Fullerton is definitive on the world stage. Banned in China, is what all publications about Tibet state, so, get it? Its funny because it doesn’t say Banned In China, it says Banned in Fullerton. And people then ask themselves, “where is Fullerton, isn’t that some place in America? Do they ban books in America? Oh ha ha I get it they ban books about themselves in America Tee Hee, because they are their own worst enemy. Oh those Zany Americans!”


seer2some on December 26, 2011
Gee, , , everyone, , let’s line up…..it only costs $199.99 a copy………..

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Seer2some,
You just made me smile. Do you know if people who regularly post seemingly inappropriate comments are ever blocked my Admin? I’ve noticed that several posters toss the word “blocked” around. Of course, I don’t want to regret what I wish for and get myself blocked.

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Excuse the typo, I meant “by Admin”

Reality Is Missed on December 26, 2011
I just wish Reality Is would come back. Boring around here without him. At least he gave us something to debate and provided us good info from the other side.

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
I know that’s you in disguise Reality Is! You’re being sneaking trying to miss yourself in front of everyone. The grammar and the frowny face totally gave you away! Lol. I dare you to try and argue with “Policemisconduct”…

Jane H on December 26, 2011
Rolling eyes!

policemc on December 28, 2011 (awaiting moderation, AKA permanently banned)
In America you get to face your accuser, to block me after all of you attack me so relentlessly is to deny a constitutionally guaranteed right: the right to face my accusers and to defend myself. On the other hand your hate speech is pretty much unlawful in America, and I wouldn’t normally have to defend myself, because people like you would normally be in jail or a mental hospital, or you would have been shut up by court order. Why it is allowed here is a mystery.

policemc on December 26, 2011
Wholesale

seer2some on December 26, 2011
I don’t know, , but Carolyn/Nancy sure is a prime candidate to be blocked….. maybe they will act now, as she’s very abusive to people while she’s trying to force things her way………I think everyone has had enough…….

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Have you noticed how he or she (in this case policemc) posts 6-7 ramblings in a row and everyone kinda stops talking for a moment. I got really tired about reading her repeated rape Mary stories yesterday; and on Christmas too!

CRAZY MARY is a homeless woman who tells people (in a steady loop) that Ron Thomas periodically invites her into his home, and gives her the key to an out building, where he rapes and beats her, causing her to flee abandoning her belongings. She has been telling this story for a decade, in it’s many variations. Carolyn Phillips recalled Mary’s Story, in a solicitation for her whereabouts.


policemc on December 26, 2011
I just wish that you were brighter, snippy crosstalk, which is what you do here, is not very demanding, which is why you like it; you do not have the capacity to meet the demands of anything more sophisticated. ‘Bloody Mary’ was a school teacher, who was whisked away in an ambulance when her brutalization by rapist cops and their cooperatives became a potential embarrassment to the police department. I want to know what happened to her. You the public should want to know why it happened, and concern yourself that it happens in Fullerton regularly. You could start with locating Helen (Crazy Mary) and getting her statement, regarding Ron, into FBI hands. Christmas was not a good day at all for the street people who were abused by cops in Fullerton yesterday. While you were getting plowed on eggnog. You are Friends of Fullerton right? Well it isn’t very friendly to anyone who scratches the surface, maybe you should work on changing that.

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
I don’t drink eggnog.

policemc on December 26, 2011
(seer2some regarding your comment above) What specific abuse? What things am I trying to force my way? No wonder no one takes you seriously. You are all bravado but no substance. “She is very abusive to people, while she is trying to force things her way.” Specify the abuse, and the ‘things’ that I am trying to ‘force my way,’ which is what way exactly? Tell the sysop, if you want me blocked. Or do you just want to be nasty, because that is all you are accomplishing. Aren’t you even slightly embarrassed that there is a 450 page book, at your disposal, stating who I am with pictures, and yet, you are still perplexed and confused, about my identity. Do you imagine that your readers don’t find that laughable? KFI wanted to review it, because in their opinion it is beautiful and well written. I said no because I have to proof read it, yet, and because you are their audience, and my audience is graduate school art students and public policy think tanks. That our paths crossed, is simply out of respect for Kelly’s passing, which is why I offered Ron the book. But he turns out to be a tar pit, complete with you.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
I see no respect for Kelly’s passing……all I see is a self serving opportunist………

policemc on December 27, 2011
That’s because you are interested in being blind in order to provoke a response or defense from me. You are like an angry demanding little boy hurling accusations without basis in fact. You don’t know me, you didn’t know Kelly, you are just one of Ron’s blind followers.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
When she first started posting here and just went on and on, , she said that she’s an artist and a writer, and that’s how she creates her ‘art’. I think she talked to some homeless people (I read where she promised them the books profits for their cooperation, and they were wondering when they were going to get paid). Anyway, her bag lady persona is derived from speaking with them, and is the narrator of her book…….
Frankly, she reminds me of a speed freak that’s been on a two day hoot……..and she does it to get everyone’s attention…..I’m NOT impressed..

policemc on December 26, 2011 (not moderated)
Seer, There are no ‘speed freaks’ in museum collections, because, work of the caliper that gets into important collections take skill, and constant work, did you look at my work and conclude that a drug addict could have done it. No you are just making up libelous comments based on nothing. Why do you say such caustic things to demean me? It only disgraces you in everyone’s eyes. How do I “remind you of speed freaks,” your words are meant to provoke a defense, but that comment is really just stupid. Lastly, your ‘attention’ offends me. You can’t imagine that it could be otherwise. You’re really creepy. The book is gorgeous and elegant because I keep people like you at bay, in order to refine my skills. You must have figured out that people who are accomplished in fine art, don’t hang out with people like you, who constantly burden them with demanding quacking crap requiring attention in the form of demanding a defense. Which I might add is exactly what Ron was doing as well. Tacky tactics. And what he is still using you to do. Pawn.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Uhh, , I am accomplished in fine art……it was my minor in college……..

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
I also did fine art in undergrad, and my graduate degree is a Master’s of Architecture I. I looked at the link you provided that led me to her “book.” It looks like she learned her typography and layout skills in a Microsoft Paint tutorial…

policemc on December 26, 2011
You are both lying because you think it makes you seem clever. The book looks like what it is, and the problem for you is that what it is would be over your head and wasted on you. A masters in architecture from what, like a crappy state school? Crappy enough to get you employment where, at the police department?

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Um…. police departments normally hire policemen, not architect interns.

policemc on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
They hire architects, statisticians, accountants, researchers, lawyers; they hire all manner of people, even artists, and public policy analysts, not just patrol officers.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Gee, , with your Einstein IQ, you would think you’d learn how to spell……….No, , the problem is we know the difference…….your lies only work on people who don’t know the difference.

policemc on December 27, 2011
Specify the lies, the lies that ‘won’t work on us,’ what are they? You know the difference about what? Spelling?

Jane H on December 26, 2011
Will you please shut up!
~Dr. Hee Haw

Jane H on December 26, 2011
Not you s2s

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Hey wait a minute. It just hit me. Did Molly have to fill out a blue card?
seer2some on December 26, 2011
Haha, , probably not…..

policemc on December 26, 2011
As you know I have an attorney, and my work has a dollar amount of value. I’m just saying before you get too involved in taking pot shots, keep in mind that libel suits are very very expensive for the libeler. Don’t throw your mock disgust around too casually; all that my lawyer has to do is claim that you made public aspersions regarding my work to potential buyers, and bingo the court attaches your yearly income; transferring half of it from your account into mine. I’m serious, grow up for a second and think about kicking down something that has proof of worth. It might come back to bite you. You feel invisible here, but any lawyer can subpoena your ID from the systems operator, among others.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Take your best shot! I know something about this too…….This is a forum for comments and opinions……..I’ll stand by my opinions…….
The proof of worth is only in your mind……..You took law in school? I think not! Your statements don’t back up what you say your background is….

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Policemc wrote: all that my lawyer has to do is claim that you made public aspersions regarding my work to potential buyers, and bingo the court attaches your yearly income
So, I think that she made it clear that she’s using FFFF to sell her book and NOT to voice opinions or share valid information. Is this site suppose to be used free advertising? What would a lawyer say about that?

seer2some on December 26, 2011
That’s exactly what we’ve been saying all along….

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Also, , she’s misinformed….it doesn’t work like that….

Anonymous on December 26, 2011
No lawyer would take your case after seeing your rantings on here.

Steve Brow on December 26, 2011
Carolyn, I think that between your lawyer’s claim and the court ordered attachment, there has to be something called a “trial”.
And I remember Fullerton High Journalism teacher Nell Guyette teaching us in the 1970′s that libel was the easiest charge to make and the hardest charge to prove.
Since you have stated that your work has a defined dollar amount, what dollar value do you attribute to your work, and how do you determine it. (And I ask this as someone who has been paid as much as $3.00 per hour for writing)
Note also that comments disparaging you on this website can only be used to regain losses if you can demonstrate and compute those lossess to the satisfactin of a jury and a judge. However, on this very thread you have stated that no one cares about Fulllerton and this website has little worth. These are statements that can be used in court.
Now, would you like to take up my offer of help in paragraphing, which is the excersize of ptting streams of rational thought in to categorized themes. This helps the reader greatly, but helps the writer even more.

policemc on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
Systems Operator / Moderator, It is very unAmerican of you to let them attack me, while blocking me from defending myself. Steve, Maybe you watch too much TV, jury trials are not automatic in America, this is not France. In America Jury trials are very very rare, and only granted by a formal request to the court. The request can not be denied. 99.9% of cases are decided without a jury, these are termed ‘bench’ trials, bench means Judge. Outside of high profile felony cases the only reason to convene a jury is to force the opposition to back down, juries cost about 100 thousand bucks per day, the tax payer is not asked to accept that burden ordinarily. In civil libel cases there is only one argument, the case is decided on ‘fact.’ I don’t know of a jury ever being convened in a libel case, but there may be examples that I don’t know of. If the libeler has made an aspersion with no basis in fact, the person who was libeled wins. As I recall Texan, or one of you, commented that I used a Microsoft program to publish the book, in ‘fact’ I used adobe. Calculate: that aspersion (with no basis in fact) equals ten (dollars per book) times the number of viewers to this website, (thousands) that is the amount in damages that the court awards. Because it is assumed that those people were discouraged from purchasing the book, which was inaccurately (without basis in fact) deemed inferior “Microsoft Paint tutorial” here. However since the readers of this sort of blog are not my target audience, why would I bother to sue? Gee, thanks fellow legal researchers for not jumping in to back me up here. What are you afraid of; homeless cooties? Here is a nonpublished fact, (not published here, anyway, because our health department keeps us in the dark lest we panic.) The three most polluted places in the world are Canton, Mexico City, and Fullerton. The airborn particulate matter in all three consists predominantly of fecal matter, because of the high concentration of homeless people, and the low ratio of public ‘facilities’ AKA bathrooms. Orange County is one of the rare locations in America where laundromats do not contain fifty cent showers. In case you are wondering why you behave like alcoholics it’s because airborne fecal matter causes severe toxemia (liver damage). Toxic from the inside out, as you are.

policemc on December 26, 2011 (not moderated)
Seer, The above quote that you entered regarding photos was in response to Sean Cupp asking me what I want for Christmas. He is a famous wildlife photographer and good friend. I never asked anyone for photos of Kelly. Ron’s Lt. Curtis, at Mary’s Kitchen gave me a photo from the paper, I said, no thanks, he insisted. It is the only photo of Kelly in the book, I matched it with some hummingbird photos that I took and with drawings, since the book is entirely written and illustrated by me. Most of what pertains to Kelly in the book asks KFI to stop their hate speech about the homeless. I have been a nun since 1971, I don’t have any money, I am homeless, I have been a bag lady here for 20 years. Everyone in the Tri-City knows me, I give away every dime that comes my way to homeless people. I gave Mrs. Wyatt about three thousand dollars and did all of her legal work for her (false arrest) battery case. I got that money doing a grading job for DeBeers, where I was trained as a diamond dealer. I give bikes to people who need them, and whatever else being a nun affords me the ability to give. It’s all in the book which you burned sight unseen. When people give me money, for example if I sell a drawing, I put it into other people, no one is: as you claim, waiting on promises from me. I always beat them to the punch, because I am mindful of anticipating the needs of others, which is the Buddhist way. What are their names, these people who you are lying about? These people who you say that I have defrauded with promises, who are they? My picture is on the inside front cover of the books, and throughout. The other pics (Nancy Wood and Carolyn Phillips) are of me in the past. My education is in art and law, so, because of that and because my IQ is higher than Einstein’s, the book looks like it cost a million bucks to make, it costs 190 to print, that is what Blurb charges, the other ten bucks goes to Sharon, and John, so far, and whoever else is in it who wants to sign on the account, it just cost me hard work and caring for the people who are in it. I know their stories, not because I solicited them, but because I was there, with them. Serving God is the only job worth doing. Try it some time, instead of impugning the credibility of people who do. I have no history of mental illness or drug abuse, I don’t even drink coffee. I studied at the Myingma Graduate School in Tibetan Studies under Tarthang Tulku Rinpoche, and I practice the teachings of Tibetan Buddhism, after Padmasambava, as a simple nun living on an offramp. I spend nothing on myself, everything that I do is for others. That is the Buddhist way.

by Jane H on December 26, 2011
been a bag lady here for 20 years. Every one in the Tri-City knows me, I give away every dime that comes my way to homeless people. I gave Mrs. Wyatt about three thousand dollars and did all of her legal work for her false arrest case. I got that money doing a grading job for Debeers, where I was trained as a diamond dealer. I give bikes to people who need them, and whatever else being a nun affords me the ability to give. It’s all in the book which you burned sight unseen. When people give me money, for example if I sell a drawing, I put it into
******HELP! I’M LOST IN WORDS!******
other people, no one is: as you claim, waiting on promises from me. I always beat them to the punch, because I am mindful of anticipating the needs of others, which is the Buddhist way. What are their names, these people who you are lying about? These people who you say that I have defrauded with

THE POGROM ATTACK AS A MOB, born of jealously or motivated by malice, the following comments are specifically designed to damage the salability of The Jabberwocky, by individuals who have not read it: For example, headlines can be ‘enlarged’ to view, but the ‘preview,’ is too small, yet seer2some claims to have read the pages of The Jabberwocky, “If you enlarge the screen you can read the pages….”


Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
I hope she didn’t do her own editing for her book. In the English language, we use verbs, correct tense, and punctuation.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
If you enlarge the screen you can read the pages, , she just rants and thinks she’s sounding like a homeless person……….I was bored as it made little sense…..kind of like trying to write what life is like being an Indian, , from talking to a few of them……….
Some of her posts on here are taken from the book………everyone will give up trying to read it after the first few pages……
Notice how lucid she sounds when she’s trying to convince us of something?

(ASIDE: “Some of her posts on here are taken from the book…” Carolyn Phillips / Nancy Wood, has never posted on Friends of Fullerton’s Future or any blog other than her own. In fact, the only comment (termed “post” by seer2some) from The Jabberwocky, on Friends of Fullerton’s Future, is “Mary:” comments entered as three ‘paragraph’ comments, on Christmas.


Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Lately I haven’t noticed any lucidity in her posts at all. She thinks for some reason I drink eggnog in large quantaties (original) and don’t have a Masters in Architecture.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
That’s just part of her bag lady persona rants……she is abusive and hits below the belt to unsettle anyone that may question her….

Anonymous on December 26, 2011
I just read it too. Ohhhhhh. And I thought she was just a schizophrenic. Wow. Crazy, psychopathic woman in my opinion.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
No, , watch how she switches back and forth when it’s convenient for her…….people who have problems can’t do that on que…..

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
I think I see what you mean. For example on the other blog about the DVD she started commenting about how she got the Samsung joke. Then she replied to Van get it da artiste that she thinks all the sites or blogs should tie back to police corruption. Was she trying to set the stage for another crazy rant and hence plug her book?

(ASIDE: Concerned Texan confuses blog pages for “all of the sites or blogs…” when he states, “…she replied to Van get it da artiste that she thinks all the sites or blogs should tie back to police corruption.” In fact, he means a comment reply in which policemc referred to ‘police misconduct’ not corruption, or other blogs and sites, as an ‘all roads lead to Rome’ pun on her name.) The sort of humorless nattering and sniping attacks evidenced here by seer2some, anonymous, concerned Texan, and their cheerleader Jane H (who is in fact a police officer) is prohibited on other blogs, for obvious reasons.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Exactly, , look at her posts about contacting her lawyer…….then look at the one where she claims to be a nun and a Buddhist……

policemc on December 27, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
Actually, the term for that is ‘circular time’ you would know that if you read the book. I know that you are not too stupid to see how skillful and gorgeous the book is, so I must assume that you are just mean and petty. Or that you didn’t look at it.

policemc on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
You all back up each others lies, you didn’t read it. You want it to seem as if you did. Because, that gives you a sense of authority in the aspersions that you cast. What you are doing is unlawful. And typical of teens, who still experience a sense of infallibility and anonymity in their abuse of power: without any concept of accountability. So, I must assume that you are teens, by your relentless proclamations without any basis in fact. Why a blog operator would indulge you is beyond me. And yes I am going to copy your comments to a chapter in my next book. Because you are what is wrong with America. You are demanding, and you confuse your pejoratives for opinions, and you confuse your proclamations for truths.

policemc on December 27, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
The Jabberwocky is written in circular time, as stated on the cover. (Asian time) I’m sorry that your whole purpose in your interactions with the world is to supplant fun with hate, and education with ignorance. Shakespeare spelled many words including his own name as many as seven different ways; spelling doesn’t have much to do with great literature. James Joyce wrote ten page paragraphs.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Please, , so now you’re a nun and a Buddhist…..is that for my benefit because of my login name? My login name was given to me and comes from my ability and extensive background in financial investments. To some people, I am a seer…….
You’re a pathological liar and forget that you don’t know the background of the posters on here, , some of us know better and are tired of your BS….
I stand by my previous comments……….

Concerned Texan on December 26, 2011
Nuns are not bag ladies, they have jobs to do.

policemc on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
Do you think that this sounds idiosyncratic “…a Buddhist nun…is that for my benefit, because of my login name?” It’s not all about you. Some people hold a place in world without being even slightly interested in you. For example, what would interest me in the type of person who denounces another person as a “pathological liar” using as proof the proverbial ‘mob mentality’ argument, “some of us know better.” Know better than what? What are the specific ‘pathological lies.’ Do you even know what the term ‘pathological’ means, or did you once again, libel me nonsensically because it makes you feel important and powerful? “I stand by my comments” isn’t that like saying, ‘to thyne own self be true’ which is an adage used to indicate ‘total fool,’ you thought it had literal meaning didn’t you? Moderator, shouldn’t you step up to the plate about now and explain to them that what they are doing is anti-social at best?

Anonymous on December 26, 2011
PEOPLE, DON’T ENCOURAGE NANCY/CAROLYN IF YOU WANT HER TO QUIT COMMENTING. SHE NEEDS HELP AND MEDICATION AND NOT THIS BACK AND FORTH!

policemc on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
Please don’t use flames, speaking of anti-social. On any other blog you would be tossed for flaming. Flaming is a methodology employed by grade school kids who can not articulate their thoughts without shouting, AKA using all caps. It’s not allowed in “polite” society. Apparently you interpret any criticism to be “below the belt” in fact, what I am telling you, are things that you are long overdue to be told. Ah hem, isn’t that right neglectful (parent) moderator. You are not doing them a favor by sparing them the consequences of their actions.

seer2some on December 26, 2011
Sorry, , I disagree….I’m a Parent Advocate of Chronically Ill and Handicapped Children, , and I used to go talk to parents at Brea Neuro Hospital that had suffered nervous breakdowns….
People with problems can’t turn it off and on at will, or on que…… which is exactly what she does….she will try and bully people as long as she thinks she can get away with it. She has been nothing but abusive to most posters here and I say………….ENOUGH!

Steve Brow on December 26, 2011
A child in my family was at that hospital and had his nose broken when attacked in his sleep by another “patient”. It was handled responsibly and the hosipital (original) paid for the insurance costs not covered by the family’s own insurance.
Later it was read in the Register that this hospital had 40 lawsuits against them and it closed. What a hell hole.
Maybe it was another hospital of a similar name. It was some 30 years ago or more. I had almost forgotten about it, but you brought it back to memory.

Steve Brow on December 26, 2011
Really, the doctors at the old Brea Neuro-Psych were the compatriates (original) of Ciscinelli.

seer2some on December 27, 2011
No, it was a while ago since I have been there…..I’m not a medical person, , just a parent that went to talk to other parents in there…….You’d be surprised at the records of the ‘good’ local hospitals we have now… My point was that people with mental problems can’t switch back and forth at will when exhibiting behavior that’s questionable.

Steve Brow on December 27, 2011
Really? As if a mental problem is “one thing” that you either have or do not have and as if there are no degrees–one is either crazy or not.
Responding to the world around oneself is tricky in itself even for average people. Why do we make so many big mistakes? It is intelligent people who see more logical contradictions than unintelligent people. Some can’t process them.
Who is crazy? The hyperactive boy who can’t sit still in the classroom or the people who think that little boys are made to line up and sit still and be quiet all day? If we take that boy, put him in a hospital setting, tell him it is for the purpose of doctors evaluating and helping him, and as part of the process he is attacked and bones are broken, who is crazy? The boy? The other boy who attacked him? The doctors? Or the parents that trusted the hospital?
People with all sorts of mental problems have responses to the world and can “switch back and forth”. Part of the Kelly Thomas case is Ron Thomas describing how Kelly normally responded to the police. DA T-rack described how Kelly was trying to obey commands and was having difficulty. The whole story is the cops responding to Kelly as if he were a dangerous criminal who they had the right to subdue. So who was crazy? Who was criminal?
It is not unusual for people of high intelligence to have difficulty relating to the world around them. Their self-perception of themselves as intelligent convinces them that people who don’t see things the same are stupid. They can be blind to the fact that part of intelligence is to learn from other intelligent people, often differing to them, compromising, and building systems.
From Carolyn’s own testimony, she seemed to have done well learning in schools of intelligent people, but has been rejected when it came to the point of doing the work. Finding herself homeless, she is continuing her work and her ways in that environment. It seems that she views herself as compassionate but has a hostility when her views are not accepted. Then again, that describes me.
So yes, Carolyn is attracted to this issue and sees it as part of her work. Then again, back in July Ron was out on the street seeking the attention of anyone who would listen. This might not be the forum for Carolyn and Ron Thomas has his hands full without dealing with Carolyn.
But I do have a question for those on this website who want to be viewed as compassionate towards Kelly Thomas but pass Carolyn off with an insult or an “off her meds” comment. Who is crazy here?

policemc on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
Seer, (regards your previous comment) You have to say what the “bullying” is that you claim I am attempting to get away with. If you do not specify what you are referring to you sound like a five year old yelling, ‘mommy mommy she started it.’ What did I start, what is the specific phrase to which you are attributing bullying? State the specific ‘abuses’ that you claim I have inflicted, and state the names of the “most” posters (to whom you are referring). I have not contacted any posters at all. You people are commentators, you are not posters, the posters are the people who write posted articles, (at the top of the pages). You are commenting not posting. Geeese, you need to get out more. This is not the world, why doesn’t the moderator tell you that?

cg on December 26, 2011
Are others allowed to blog now? Or is the commerial (original) of homeless cazy (original) lady (liar book writer?) still going on?

policemc on December 27, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
(Regards a different Friends of Fullerton blog page.) There is something fishy about a Civil Rights writer, Tony ‘Jackal’ Bushala, and a Legal Column writer (OC Weekly’s Scott Moxley) who call themselves Civil Rights activists but who censor blog comments by troops in the trenches.)
Ron Thomas’ organizer Curt, sucker punched me…insisting that I participate at the ‘Kelly Thomas Memorial’ events; he gave me pics of Kelly to put in a book…I did put a pic from the papers in ‘The Jabberwocky’ blurb.com book. Ron… tried to sue me for unauthorized use of photos; the photo of Kelly is public domain. They Saw Me Coming: previously I had tried… to help Curtis…Curt insisted that I wanted to steal his ideas, a book about the transit system…my books are art books, not bus books…Curt was awe struck by my work…(but) no matter what I showed him or gave to him, he criminalized me. When I found out that he isn’t even homeless, but eats at Mary’s kitchen where he offers free bus passes (for a lewd fee) to homeless women, I felt hoodwinked. …They tried to play me like a slot machine. Ron posted to the ‘Friends of Fullerton’ blog: “This woman is out of her mind. ‘Kelly is dead so that Ralph’s can stay in business.’ Carolyn Phillips needs to leave me and Kelly alone. She has sent many E-Mails to me and some others with the same kind of BS. If anyone knows who she is, please get her some help.” –Ron
(He is referring to 2 emails offering the book as a gift, he never previewed it. He was mad that his manipulative lawsuit scheming didn’t get anything off of me: he sent his attack-trained army of couch potatoes after me with Internet libel. Ron Thomas constantly proclaims the evils of opportunists feasting greedily on kelly’s carcass, he denounced me with the zeal of a town crier; “Me thinks (Ron) doth protest too much.” Lets start asking the right questions: what is Ron getting out of all of this. Lets start talking to the people who knew Kelly, the people who have been censored by Ron’s Army.

policemisconduct on December 28, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
Dialog between commentators is not allowed on legitimate blogs, I think that you are confusing this for a twitter account. You are not blogging; you are commenting, and you are doing it about me, to each other, which is totally prohibited on legitimate accounts, because what happens is this sort of digression, (indulged by Bushala). While it makes for a fascinating book chapter it is unacceptable here and it reflects poorly on the person in charge.

seer2some on December 27, 2011
I know you do, , I just don’t find very many mentally ill people tying their illness into making money for themselves. If they have the mental clarity to do that, it makes me question whether their illness is self serving…………and their motives behind using it that way…..

policemc December 28, 2011
Are you talking about Molly or me? Or just anyone who you decide that you don’t like?

policemc on December 27, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
I read all of your posts, in them I am generally denounced as self-serving, for money, and or attention, in many you insinuate mental illness. My purpose is of enlightening society and influencing or changing the normative behavior that victimizes homeless people. No one could read your twisted hate filled vitriol, and endless abusive comments and not be persuaded that ‘protected status’ needs to be applied to homeless people. I lift your comments and include them in ‘Layover Review’ a newsletter that addresses pro-protected status for the homeless, via legislation. Several states have already given protected status to the homeless. You drew me in here, exactly the way that society draws victims in for exactly the same purpose everywhere in America: to have a hate target. ‘Mental illness’ and ‘homelessness’ are synonymous in all of your attacks, but you never seem to be able to specify the attacks that you attribute to me, that you claim, arise from the mental illness that you attribute to me: The victim is always deemed the perpetrator in hate crimes, by the real perpetrator. It’s the short skirt equals ‘asking for it,’ argument, but here you have supplanted ‘short skirt’ for ‘homeless / mentally ill,’ in as many vulgar colloquialisms as you think make you sound clever, and, here, my invitation (‘asking for it’) has been exchanged with ‘seeking attention’, in your vernacular. A phrase that you use consistently. As if your ‘attention’ qualifies as anything but rape. Hate has enabled your reality, and it is not a reality based on any facts at all, but rather the machinations of your hate. You make my argument perfectly. You are so in love with your hate, that you can’t think past it. Most of all you love to scream at me: ‘liar.’ Which I guess you imagine absolves you of your lies regarding me, or perhaps of your attachment to remaining ignorant about me. Which conveniently justifies your book burning: why read when you can call the author a liar. Why specify what lies you are referring to when you can simply out shout my defenses, with slurs? Seer2some is the most vitriolic, why? I know what his trigger is, he appears to hate the concept of someone homeless having marketable skills. As if my being equates to the presence of a ‘nigger’ on the white side of the street. He has built a whole conspiracy to justify his suspicions. Since he can’t tolerate the fact that I’m talented and homeless; he deems me an opportunist who has fooled and victimized the uninitiated. The other curious preoccupation is with spelling. And the use of paragraphs. Although neither are considered consequential to blogging. Blogging has it’s own language; the use of paragraphs, flames, and convention spelling is considered rude and tedious. You confuse “posts,” when you are making comments. Which causes a reasonable person to question your sobriety.

DEMONIC DEFINED: seer2some, leads the jackal pack trifecta of evil: Concerned Texan, Anonymous, and seer2some. Carolyn Phillips, a warmhearted, kind, open, person is constructed by the trifecta, with terms like, “abusive, liar, opportunist…” What is really astonishing is the dedication and skill that the trifecta employ, toward their artful character assignation, on Friends of Fullerton’s Future, under the endorsement of Tony Bushala.

policemisconduct on December 27, 2011 (moderated aka censored)
—- Original Message —–
From: fineart@
Sent: 12/27/11 04:13 PM
To: Carolyn Phillips
Subject: Re: new policy for the new year
Ron is an idiot, don’t take the Kelly Thomas bru-ha-ha seriously. Yours is an incredible idea, your marketing plan is bullet proof. I would like to see 500 stores nationwide selling your book, buying the book and donating it to their favorite school or library (or even their police department.) Ron missed the boat, who needs his noise, just keep going, he had his chance.
From: freetibetbooks@
Sent: 12/27/11 05:56 PM
To: fineart
Subject: Re: new policy for the new year
Dear Tom, I’ll preregister maybe I’ll get on that way, as we all know I have plenty to say, and I love to talk about art more than anything else. I’m still proof reading the book. You should see the hate mail that I am getting on that Sociopaths of Fullerton site. Now they claim to have expertise in art and architecture. It’s amazingly vitriolic; kids on drugs I’m guessing. Adults are much more clandestine than kids. I am using their comments as ‘letters to the editor, in the next volume, in an article about enacting ‘protected status’ for homeless people, so that hate crimes against the homeless can carry a ‘hate crime’ felony, and perhaps deter the little monsters from setting us on fire. Something Sociopaths of Fullerton would never think of. (Nor take time out of their busy schedule of bashing me for. Sarcasm intended.) Several states already have protected status for homeless people. The systems operator over there at Sociopaths has blocked me by popular demand of the teenagers, with little ‘moderator’ flags: Banned in Fullerton; why am I not surprised? Who knows why they are so mean, but they certainly make my argument for protected status, don’t they? I’m glad not to know them, I supposed that they all have fangs. I wonder where ’Mary’ is, I need to talk to her about Ron, maybe a church took her in for Xmas. I’ll find her sooner than later. I’m glad that I suffered the hell of manufacturing archival paper products for so many years, at least now I know my target buyers, and how to get to them. But I had not thought of police departments. Good idea. Publishing is a woman’s world; thank god. After seeing how ‘the boys’ crucify me on Sociopaths of Fullerton I’m glad that I don’t have them for a hurtle, in the real world, none of them have viewed any of my websites, but they are criticizing the book like mad, just as if they had seen it, what aholes. I checked the stats on The Jabberwocky on Blurb.com and on freetibetbook.wordpress.com; no visits from California in the past few days, when they claim to have viewed it. That’s what men do though, they think of it as killing the competition. One of them riffled through my emails, he excerpted whatever he could find that made me look opportunistic (out of context) and he pasted it into his comments, as if the excerpts applied to his points. Clever, but mean and destructive, and again, it makes my argument about persecution valid. They mostly bask in describing me as mentally ill, they take pot shots at my legal points as well, but they give no explanation for how I have never lost a case, if I’m so ‘mental’ and all. Really they devote comment after comment to denouncing me in those terms, lending themselves anecdotal expertise. It’s exquisitely stupid. Cops term homeless people ‘manipulative and mentally ill’ I have a document from a GG cop (fed evidence) in which he states his reason for not filing my IA complaint against this bud, was, ‘I judged her complaint to be manipulative and mentally ill.’ Nice try, too bad for him that the FBI didn’t agree. Maybe the Sociopaths are kids of cops. See you next time.
….
seer2some on December 26, 2011
Hi Reality Is, , actually, we are being very nice and civil to her……..more than what she deserves..

Reality Is on December 27, 2011
Hi
That’s nice of you.
I think she needs professional help.

seer2some on December 29, 2011
There was nothing contrived against Carolyn Phillips, , her OWN words were posted again for her to view. If she had problems facing what she has said, then maybe she needs to take more care in chosing (original) her words. The only mob mentally I see here is your own…….Her posts were abusive to many posters, not vice versa…

Steve Brow on December 29, 2011
Can we drop the terms abusive, hate-speach, (original) cop-haters and the like? People are expressing what they think and how they feel. What ever happened to the good old days when every first-grader could recite, “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never harm me!”

seer2some on December 29, 2011
You evidently didn’t read her posts, , she was never abusive to me, , she was just fine. But, there are others that would have cause for concern. You are entitled to your opinion, just like everyone else is entitled to theirs…..

seer2some on December 29, 2011
I didn’t post this above…

Carolyn Phillips

freetibetbooks@email.com


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: